🏗️ Architecture: How should we implement the Vitto Jarvis Evolution Plan phas...

Date: 2026-02-18
Time: 23:27:43 UTC
Session: gspace1-120.2
Agent: orchestrator
Confidence: 90%
Status: ✅ Documented

📋 Decision Context

Question:

How should we implement the Vitto Jarvis Evolution Plan phases?

Task: Not specified

🎯 Decision Made

Chosen:

Phased implementation with highest-impact first

Options Considered:

1. Implement all at once
2. Phased implementation with highest-impact first
3. Plan only, implement later

💭 Reasoning

Implemented 8 phases in Session 120: BullMQ task queue (1.1), stuck detection (1.3), space-aware auth (1.4), RBAC guards (1.5), persistent sub-agents with training (2.5/3.5), cloud cost engine (3.1), intelligent delegation (3.6). Each change is self-contained and backward-compatible. BullMQ gracefully degrades to in-memory when Redis is unavailable.

📁 Files Involved

• No files specified

🔗 Related

• Decision ID: dev_1771457263177_c55oswz
• Session: 120
• Workspace: gspace1

Auto-generated by MCP Smart Consolidation