Architecture: How should we approach closing the MCP intelligence loop — r...

Documentation for Sessions

🏗️ Architecture: How should we approach closing the MCP intelligence loop — r...

Date: 2026-02-20
Time: 15:52:40 UTC
Session: gspace1-128.3
Agent: angular
Confidence: 95%
Status: ✅ Documented

📋 Decision Context

Question:

How should we approach closing the MCP intelligence loop — rebuild services or wire existing ones?

Task: Not specified

🎯 Decision Made

Chosen:

Wire existing services (104 sub-actions, 4000+ lines of super-intelligence code already exist)

Options Considered:

  1. Rebuild services from scratch with new architecture
  2. Wire existing services (104 sub-actions, 4000+ lines of super-intelligence code already exist)
  3. Gradual migration with new services alongside old

💭 Reasoning

The Session 80 plan correctly diagnosed every problem. The tools and services were subsequently built (intelligence tool has 25 sub-actions, EpisodicMemoryService=875 lines, SimulationService=702 lines, etc). SimulationService has 227 documents proving services WORK when called. The problem is purely integration — agents don't call the tools, and the pipelines don't trigger the services. The new plan (enhance-and-wire-mcp.plan.md) focuses on 6 phases of WIRING, not building.

📁 Files Involved

🔗 Related

Auto-generated by MCP Smart Consolidation