Bugfix: How to fix the 100% reproducible crash at PLAN phase: enhanc...

Documentation for Sessions

🐛 Bugfix: How to fix the 100% reproducible crash at PLAN phase: enhanc...

Date: 2026-02-23
Time: 18:43:56 UTC
Session: gspace1-138.9
Agent: backend
Confidence: 98%
Status: ✅ Documented


📋 Decision Context

Question:

How to fix the 100% reproducible crash at PLAN phase: enhance.enhancedPrompt.substring is not a function?

Task: S138 fix enhancedPrompt type mismatch crash


🎯 Decision Made

Chosen:

Proper fix: Updated ModuleGenEnhanceResult.enhancedPrompt to union type (EnhancedPromptData | string), added two exported helper functions (getEnhancedPromptTitle, serializeEnhancedPrompt), fixed executor line 159 and analyze phase lines 46+63, updated test mock

Options Considered:

  1. Quick fix: defensive typeof check on the .substring() call only
  2. Proper fix: update the type, add helper functions, fix all consumers
  3. Change the prompt template to return a string instead of an object

💭 Reasoning

Root cause: Three files disagreed about what enhancedPrompt is. The prompt template (system-enhance.prompt.md) instructs the LLM to return an object {title, description, keyFeatures, targetUsers, impliedRequirements}. The TypeScript type said string. The executor called .substring() on it. The analyze phase passed it to a template where it rendered as [object Object]. The proper fix aligns the type with reality (union type for backward compat) and adds reusable helpers: getEnhancedPromptTitle() extracts a display name from either form, serializeEnhancedPrompt() converts the object to a human-readable string for template interpolation. Changing the prompt to return a string (option 3) would lose structured data that could be valuable for future phases. The quick fix (option 1) would leave the analyze phase receiving garbage data.


📁 Files Involved


🔗 Related


Auto-generated by MCP Smart Consolidation