Documentation: What gaps remain after S202 and what should S203+ prioritize...

Documentation for Sessions

📚 Documentation: What gaps remain after S202 and what should S203+ prioritize...

Date: 2026-03-11
Time: 04:20:48 UTC
Session: gspace1-202.6
Agent: documentation
Confidence: 95%
Status: ✅ Documented

📋 Decision Context

Question:

What gaps remain after S202 and what should S203+ prioritize?

Task: S202 handoff documentation

🎯 Decision Made

Chosen:

REMAINING GAPS: (1) E2E manual testing — generation pipeline, Studio GitLab file tree, deploy pipeline have NEVER been tested with real runs (Tasks 1.1-1.4). (2) Genome/compressor verification — needs running MongoDB to confirm they still produce valid output after S201 cost tracking changes (Task 2.3). (3) Checkpoint RESTORE — CheckpointService has save/restore/clear but VittoEngineService.recoverActiveTasks() does NOT yet check for checkpoints and resume from them. (4) Skill extraction uses SmartRouter LLM call — untested with real task data, may need prompt tuning. (5) Phase 6 (Cloudflare edge, MCP filtering) not started — ops work, low priority. (6) rollbackCloudflare() uses createVersion() which triggers a NEW deploy — not a true rollback to previous files. Works but is indirect.

Options Considered:

  1. Document all gaps honestly (chosen)
  2. Only document blocking gaps
  3. Skip gap documentation

💭 Reasoning

Honest gap documentation is critical for S203+ handoff. The biggest risk is Gap 1 — the generation pipeline has NOT been verified E2E since S200 fixes. This is the most user-visible failure mode. Gap 3 (checkpoint restore) means the checkpoint system currently saves but recovery doesn't use it yet — it still resets to 'queued'. This is incremental, not blocking.

📁 Files Involved

🔗 Related

Auto-generated by MCP Smart Consolidation