🏗️ Architecture: Should structure-management and universe-canvas components b...

📋 Decision Context

Question:

Should structure-management and universe-canvas components be consolidated?

Task: Not specified

🎯 Decision Made

Chosen:

Keep both libraries separate - they serve complementary but different purposes

Options Considered:

• No alternatives documented

💭 Reasoning

After analysis, the naming similarity caused confusion but the components serve different architectural purposes: 1) structure-management handles LAYOUT modules (headers, footers, sidebars, navigation) - the 'chrome' around content; 2) universe-canvas handles CONTENT HIERARCHY (galaxies, worlds, pages) - the organizational structure. These are complementary layers, not duplicates. Consolidating would violate single-responsibility principle.

📁 Files Involved

• libs/libs-structural/structure-management/src/lib/components/universe-visual-editor/universe-visual-editor.component.ts
• libs/libs-structural/structure-management/src/lib/components/universe-structure-editor/universe-structure-editor.component.ts
• libs/libs-space/universe-canvas/src/lib/components/universe-structure-view/universe-structure-view.component.ts
• libs/libs-space/universe-canvas/src/lib/components/galaxy-canvas/galaxy-canvas.component.ts

🔗 Related

• Decision ID: dev_1768494792936_t2uk60g
• Session: 45
• Workspace: editor2

Auto-generated by MCP Smart Consolidation