🏗️ Architecture: How should the Multi-Agent Control Center dashboard be struc...

Date: 2026-01-30
Time: 12:23:46 UTC
Session: editor2-75.2
Agent: angular
Confidence: 90%
Status: ✅ Documented

📋 Decision Context

Question:

How should the Multi-Agent Control Center dashboard be structured?

Task: Not specified

🎯 Decision Made

Chosen:

Standalone Angular library at @libs-ai/multi-agent-dashboard with signal-based state management, WebSocket service pattern from BridgeMcpConnector, and component hierarchy: SessionHeader > AgentGrid + HandoffKanban + ActivityStream. Route at /system/agent-control-center.

Options Considered:

1. Standalone library with signals
2. Component in gograb-ai-lib
3. Micro-frontend with module federation
4. Pure REST polling without WebSocket

💭 Reasoning

1. Library separation allows reuse in both gograb-space and embedded contexts. 2) Signal-based state follows project convention and provides better reactivity than pure RxJS. 3) WebSocket pattern from BridgeMcpConnector is proven to work with reconnection handling. 4) Kanban board for handoffs provides clear visual status progression. 5) Backend already has /dashboard aggregation endpoint from Session 74.

📁 Files Involved

• libs/libs-ai/multi-agent-dashboard/src/index.ts
• libs/libs-ai/multi-agent-dashboard/src/lib/services/dashboard-ws.service.ts
• libs/libs-ai/multi-agent-dashboard/src/lib/services/dashboard-state.service.ts
• libs/libs-ai/multi-agent-dashboard/src/lib/components/multi-agent-dashboard/multi-agent-dashboard.component.ts
• apps/gograb-space/src/app/app.routes.ts

🔗 Related

• Decision ID: dev_1769775823388_7m1qk13
• Session: 75
• Workspace: editor2

Auto-generated by MCP Smart Consolidation